Moderators: JeffN, f1jim, John McDougall, carolve, Heather McDougall
Heretic wrote:Mrs. Doodlepunk, unfortunately I never had an opportunity to do the tests. The only scientific test I perform on myself regularly
in the last 9 years since I started it, is to look in the mirror every morning to make sure that my reflection is still there.
Early,
Yes I would like you to substantiate your claim that you quoted, about WAP. Just take one of those contentious issues that you had in mind when you formulated your critical opinion and state the exact reason why do you think that is contradicted by science, and quote a scientific study that shows that what WAP authors wrote may be incorrect. When you do that I will be able to expand from there. Otherwise it is virtually impossible to respond to your general accusation without writing a book on the subject. I cannot defend the defendant until a specific point/accusation is made!
Heretic
r-marie wrote:So, considering that there is a metabolic theory (protein types, carbohydrat types and mixed) that some of us do better adding a little animal food which was true for me.
Steve wrote:Most of us are in the 10% fat from calories area. That is no added butter, fat, oils, animal products etc. Just good old grains legumes tubers rice and veggies, mostly starchy stuff. Read the material. By the way the difference between 10% and 30% is the difference between this program and something unsuccessful. If you do not get to 10% you never tried what we are doing. By the way we are not encouraged to eat lots of nuts and avocado in case that is your next tangent, try Furhmans website for that. Read the material. I may occaisionally jump in this thread to correct inaccurate statments such as "For us, the choice seems to be either below 30% fat and high carb as for most people on this forum" -- WRONG.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest