- For purposes of this exercise, I defined a meal as the traditional meal (breakfast, lunch, dinner) plus any snacks that I might have up until the next meal
- For each meal, I rated myself on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 being I didn't follow the principal at all, and 10 being complete compliance with the principle.) So each meal has a potential of 100 total points, and with 3 meals each day there's 300 total points for the day
- For the exercise component of the checklist, I gave myself 1 point for each minute of aerobic exercise I did that day up to the max 30 points for the day, divided equally between the three meals
So, as a couple of examples - for breakfast, I typically have a big bowl of oatmeal each morning. I struggled with the starting with a salad/soup component here. I know Mark indicated earlier a fruit salad would count, but I typically add fruit to my oatmeal and don't really want or have time to cut more fruit. So I counted the fruit in my cereal for partially fulfilling this requirement and settled for giving myself 5 out of 10 points for this component. I also counted the fruit as a vegetable for purpose of the 50/50 starch/vegetable component and gave myself full credit for that one. I do add a little almond milk to oatmeal -- uh,oh, that's some added sugar as well as high fat plant food (almonds). But in this case, I use the milk sparingly, so I think the total sugar and fat added is pretty low. Thus, I only docked myself 3 points on both the added sugar and high fat plant food components, leaving 7 of 10 points in these categories. I gave myself 10 points for all the other food categories, and since I exercised for 30 minutes that day, I gave myself the full 10 points for exercise. So my total score for that meal is 5 + 10 + 7 + 10 + 7 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 = 89/100 points.
Another example, went to dinner at the Olive Garden. I ordered a big bowl of whole grain pasta with vegetables and marinara sauce, so I gave myself 10 points for the 50/50 starch/vegetable component. Started off with a salad, so I get the full 10 points for that. I was sure to order the salad dressing on the side, but I did use a minimal amount of the dressing, which I know had oil in it. So I took off only 3 points for added oil based on the quantity of dressing used. I did have 1 breadstick (oops, that's another 3 points I took off) and had 2 glasses of wine, deducting 5 points for each glass of wine, giving me a 0 points for not drinking your calories. But I gave myself full credit for the other categories, including getting my exercise in, for a total of 84 points for that meal - which is what I would expect for this kind of meal, not a horrible score, but not something I'd want to repeat every night.
I rated myself for 3 meals for 3 days so far, with the following scores. I tend to eat the same meals repeatedly, so I have similar score. It sounds like a lot of work, but I put a table in my phone app and able to quickly scroll through and give myself a score for each meal. I like the idea of quantifying how well I'm adhering to the plan - even if the numbers I use are completely subjective (I'm sure Mark or Jeff might not have given me such high scores on my selections
![Very Happy :-D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
So far, I've rated 1 weekend day and 2 weekdays...
Weekend - 89, 90, 84 = 263
Weekday 1 - 89, 86, 94 = 269
Weekday 2 - 89, 86, 86 = 261
Hope this helps!
Chuck
Mark wrote:This seems like a method for making use of the MWL Checklist that could be really helpful for some people - for others that level of granular attention may be counterproductive. I would encourage everyone to take a moment to consider whether using this idea might work for them. If I were to do this, I'd just score each meal out of 10 and add up the results for a cumulative score; so 30/30 would be 100% adherence or an A+. I'd include my exercise for the entire day in the score for each meal, so by exercising I automatically have 3/30 (or 2/20 for two meals). That's just my first thought for a way to use this concept, but I think it may have value for a couple reasons - in addition to helping provide an immediate opportunity to get the day back on track at the very next meal, it also provides a fairly precise way to quantify one's level of adherence from day to day and week to week. Rather than having the general sense that I need to pay more attention to salt or the 50/50 plate, I would be able to see precisely how many meals were affected and be able to tell how much I was improving over the course of the week or several weeks. Again, this may not work for everybody (or even anybody) in the MWL group, but I'd be curious to hear what some of you think and how you might apply the concept. If anyone wants to give it a try for the week as an experiment, I'd be very excited to hear how it goes.